The rest of TAG was the usual mix of sessions on theory, research and practice (although it didn’t seem very ‘TAGy’ this year, no sessions on post-processualism in Star Trek…) and catching up with old friends, and meeting new ones. Highlights for me included an excellent keynote speech critiquing reflexive archaeology and multivocality at Çatalhöyük by Shahina Farid, a paper on oral history and industrial period archaeology by Kerry Massheder, Anglo-Saxon cremation pots as brewing vessels by Gareth Perry, Viking Age archaeology by James Barratt, salt-making on the Atlantic coast and the EcoSal Project by Andrew Fielding, and Michael Nevill on Industrial Archaeology, databases and Grounded Theory. I’m looking forward to next year’s conference at Bournemouth.
TAG 2012 Liverpool
I’m just back from three days at TAG in
Liverpool. I presented a short paper on simple, affordable and effective
training methods for site staff as part of the Diggers' Forum session,
the paper will be published in full next year and the DF is planning on
publishing all the papers from their session in some format. An earlier
version of my presentation is available on the FAME website: http://www.famearchaeology.co.uk/2012/07/presentations-from-fit-for-purpose/#more-618
The rest of TAG was the usual mix of sessions on theory, research and practice (although it didn’t seem very ‘TAGy’ this year, no sessions on post-processualism in Star Trek…) and catching up with old friends, and meeting new ones. Highlights for me included an excellent keynote speech critiquing reflexive archaeology and multivocality at Çatalhöyük by Shahina Farid, a paper on oral history and industrial period archaeology by Kerry Massheder, Anglo-Saxon cremation pots as brewing vessels by Gareth Perry, Viking Age archaeology by James Barratt, salt-making on the Atlantic coast and the EcoSal Project by Andrew Fielding, and Michael Nevill on Industrial Archaeology, databases and Grounded Theory. I’m looking forward to next year’s conference at Bournemouth.
The rest of TAG was the usual mix of sessions on theory, research and practice (although it didn’t seem very ‘TAGy’ this year, no sessions on post-processualism in Star Trek…) and catching up with old friends, and meeting new ones. Highlights for me included an excellent keynote speech critiquing reflexive archaeology and multivocality at Çatalhöyük by Shahina Farid, a paper on oral history and industrial period archaeology by Kerry Massheder, Anglo-Saxon cremation pots as brewing vessels by Gareth Perry, Viking Age archaeology by James Barratt, salt-making on the Atlantic coast and the EcoSal Project by Andrew Fielding, and Michael Nevill on Industrial Archaeology, databases and Grounded Theory. I’m looking forward to next year’s conference at Bournemouth.
Sections, shoring and single context recording
A
recent contract with LP Archaeology in the City of London raised some aspects
of recording worth some thought. The contract was an archaeological evaluation
on a site that straddled the projected line of the Roman, medieval and
post-medieval ditches that lie immediately outside the walls of Londinium and
London. Due to the expected depth of the archaeological deposits (geo-technical
boreholes showed up to 7.8m of potentially archaeological strata) the
evaluation strategy was for five 2.5m x 2.5m test pits that would be dug as
fully shored shafts. The test pits were located to give information on the
survival of archaeological strata, the nature of any such deposits, and the
potential survival of complex masonry and environmentally significant remains.
The pits were positioned across the site in an L-shape with three of the test
pits located to provide an east–west transect across the expected line of the
defensive ditches.
In
order to illustrate the excavated sequence it was decided to record a
representative section of each test pit, these could be used to construct an
illustrated section across the site which would illustrate the strata found in
the test pits, along with their conjectured extent. The impact of the proposed
development could be mapped against this to give an immediate visual
representation of the site. Unfortunately given the projected depth of the test
pits they would need to be close-shored with steel trench sheets and
timberwork. After the first metre or so of each pit had been dug and the shoring
had gone in, there would be little opportunity to view and record a traditional
section as due to the loose nature of the fill the trench sheets needed to be
dropped every 200-300mm to ensure the integrity of the shoring*.
View of Test Pit 3 at approximately 7m depth
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)